Barack Hussein Obama… in one interview his grandmother called him “A son of Africa,” and in another she said that she was present at his birth! So which is it, was he born in Kenya, or in Hawaii?

Here Barack Hussein Obama is seen seated with his paternal grandmother…

This pictue was taken on his trip to Kenya in 1981; and there is even one recordering where even his grandmother calls him “A son of Africa,” which means that he was native born in Africa!


I’ve been having an ongoing correspondence with someone who responded to a blog I did on September 26th, regarding a WorldNetDaily article (see video below) on Obama’s eligibility status, and the release of recent information/documents that indicate a possible cover up.


I’m going to attempt to sort through this controversy over Obama’s eligibility and attempt to make some sense out of it; as this person who wrote me, who is obviously a loyal Obama supporter, has been telling me that this whole eligibility issue is nothing more than a contrived “myth” (which is the word that was used):

“It is a myth that he (Obama) has blocked access to early records. There has not been a lawsuit against Obama either for his birth certificate or for records. The lawsuits you are referring to were mainly attempts to stop the election or stop the Congress from certifying the election (which it did, unanimously) or stop the Inauguration. There was never a lawsuit that simply asked Obama to deliver a birth certificate or records to a court. NEVER.”

Apparently this person believes that this whole controversy has been made up; and is also trying to make the point that there have been no lawsuits, and that Obama has not blocked access to his records.

Well, according to Wikipedia going back as far as mid-December of 2008, even back then there were at least 17 lawsuits on record that had been filed challenging Obama’s eligibility, requesting that he be compelled to release additional documentation relating to his citizenship.

The states where these lawsuits were filed include: North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Connecticut, New Jersey, Texas and Washington.

Then there is the pending case of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a medical doctor in the U.S. Army (who is in his 18th year of service). He is being court marshaled for refusing to accept orders to return to Afghanistan, based on this whole ineligibility issue of the Commander in Chief; and the judge in that case has just issued the following ruling, which contains an obvious and embarrassing message to Congress:


This Obama Eligibility issue has been debated and discussed for quite some time now, and I would like to just make the point that at least in my opinion, it is just a matter of common sense that if I were being challenged as to my place of birth, and whether or not I were a United State’s citizen, I would just pay the $10 to have my “long form” official birth certificate released. What’s the big deal?

After all, you and I and every other American citizen for that matter, has had to do this any number of times: to get a passport, to register and get a Social Security card, and for any other number of other reasons.

And by the way, on the subject of Social Security Number, how is it that as per a story in WorldNetDaily, posted June 10th, 2010, Obama’s Social Security Number is registered in the State of Connecticut?


The obvious question here that should be asked by any normal thinking person, is if Obama was born in the U.S. then why all this controversy and why all the expense in attorney fees (which is upwards of a million dollars so far) over something that is so easy to prove… unless he doesn’t have one?

Alan Keyes in the following video gives an excellent overview of this entire controversy, and makes a number of valid points that at the very least should raise enough reasonable doubt to warrant a Congressional investigation, not only to investigate this President, but also we need to investigate those members of Congress, such as Nancy Pelosi, who were involved with the alleged cover-up, and did not properly vet this president prior to the election.


There are two documents that have surfaced on the internet as Obama’s “Official Birth Certificate,” one is a facsimile copy of something called a “Certification of Live Birth,” that has been published over the internet, and was supposedly issued by the State of Hawaii.


As a comparison, look at this copy of a “Long Form” Birth Certificate that was issued in Hawaii in 1963; and even take a look at your own Birth Certificate, and see the obvious differences that are missing from this Obama facsimile:


If you will note, none of the following information is included on the Obama facsimile:

  1. There is NO hospital named
  2. Residence information of the mother is missing
  3. There is NO age given for either the father or the mother
  4. There is NO birthplace given for either the father or the mother
  5. There is NO occupation listed for either the father or mother
  6. There is NO parent DOB or age of parent or parent place of birth.
  7. Note also the Father’s race would not be “African”, as this is his country of origin, not his race; and besides in the early 60’s, before the term “Black” came into vogue as acceptable, the term that was used on any official document was “Negro.”
  8. There is NO attending physician name listed
  9. There is NO attending physician signature or license number
  10. Was this a single birth or multiple birth?
  11. There is NO parent signature
  12. There is NO Registrars name or signature.

There is also another matter of no small importance that we need to examine, regarding Obama’s facsimile copy of  “Certification of Live Birth,” that is being put forth as his only proof of citizenship; and that is this document is alleged to have been tampered with and photo-shopped.

This man you are about to hear on the video interview is a expert on this subject; his testimony was sought to be used in one of the trails; and the reason why his face is disguised is because there have been threats on his life:

Now there is also a Kenyan birth certificate that has surfaced; and according to a WorldNetDaily article, that posted back in August of 2009, a California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and he filed a motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.


The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.


No doctor is listed, but the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964. WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.


There was also found a counterfeit document purporting to be Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate that made its rounds over the Internet; but was quickly determined to be fraudulent. The above document released by Taitz bears to have none of the obvious traits of a hoax.

Unlike the Certification of Life Birth facsimile that Obama is using as his official birth certificate, at least on this Kenyan certificate we have the name of the register, the name of the hospital, and you can clearly see it has a raised stamp; none of which is on the Facsimile copy of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth.

At least with the name of the Deputy Registrar, and with dates and such, it should be easy enough to verify whether this document is authentic or not, if someone in our government would only take the time to look; and certainly as I just pointed out, there is more information to authenticate on this Kenyan birth certificate than there is on the Obama facsimile.

Also you will note that what Obama has published over the internet as his official birth certificate is what is called a “Certification of Live Birth,” and it is NOT a “Certificate of Live Birth,” and apparently there is a difference; howbeit as we check into this subject it gets rather confusing, as there seems to be conflicting reports from within the various departments of Hawaii on this subject.

Obama’s ‘birth certificate’ not acceptable in Hawaii?

The Hawaiian certification of live birth Barack Obama posted on his campaign website and distributed to select news organizations as proof he was a “natural born citizen” would not be accepted as a “birth certificate” even for some Hawaiian state government eligibility issues, according to a World Net Daily posted article on June 9, 2009. (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100451)

The investigation follows a Honolulu Star Bulletin column Saturday, which quotes a state Department of Health spokeswoman as saying the state’s current certification of live birth is recognized “as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.”

The website of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, however, states clearly the certification of live birth touted by the Obama campaign, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs and a host of other Obama defenders is not acceptable as a form of identification to qualify under this program.

As WND has reported, certifications of live birth were widely issued to Hawaiians born in foreign countries in 1961, the year Obama was born.

The Star Bulletin column goes on to report: “The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii birth certificate received national attention during last year’s presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama’s American citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his campaign website a fake.”

However, Obama’s “citizenship” was never the question raised during the campaign or after the election.

The issue raised by WND has consistently been that Obama failed to prove he was actually born in Hawaii and thus constitutionally qualified to become president as a “natural born citizen” – which requires that the birth took place in the United States.

The qualifications for the Hawaiian Home Lands program require a certified copy of a standard birth certificate – also known as the “long-form certificate” filled out in the hospital and including details such as the name of the hospital and the attending physician.

“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green,” the qualifications state. “This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”

According to Hawaii’s Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo, the state only issues “certifications” of live births since 2001 when the health department went paperless. It is only available in electronic form, she said.

“At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting,” she is quoted as telling the Star Bulletin. “The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests,” Okubo said.

She did not explain how those needing a standard long-form birth certificate to qualify for programs such as those offered by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands or to establish proof of eligibility to be president could be fulfilled.

She said the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state’s current certification of live birth “as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.”

She did not, however, cite any specific rulings, and the Supreme Court has not taken up the issue of whether the certification of live birth would qualify a presidential candidate as eligible under the “natural born citizen” clause.

The truth is if you or I ever tried to use the Obama styled facsimile, as is posted on the internet, as our official Birth Certificate in order to do whatever; say to get a passport, we wouldn’t even get to first base; as they make it very clear what is required as proof of citizenship:

A certified birth certificate has a registrar’s raised, embossed, impressed or multicolored seal, registrar’s signature, and the date the certificate was filed with the registrar’s office, which must be within 1 year of your birth.

Please note, some short (abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes.

Not only that, but with this Obama Facsimile, he couldn’t even get a job as a cook in the White House, as it fails to meet even the minimum background secerity requirements; and yet how did he get elected to the White House?

As was pointed out by Alan Keyes, and also in the above article from WND, it is a known fact that “Certification of Live Birth” documentation, such as the one Obama is using, has in the past been given to people in Hawaii who were in fact born outside of the United States; and that is because according to the statue pertaining to how to apply, there is nothing that necessitates that an individual be American born; but only that he can prove himself to be a resident of the State of Hawaii.

Please pay close attention to the following Hawaiian legal statue, as to what the requirements are, and how one goes about obtaining a “Certification of Live Birth:”

“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]

As you can see, according to the above statue any adult can apply for this document, as long as they can walk into the Hawaii version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii.

For a child, however, according to the wording of this statue, they could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest. There is no mention of any required verification when it comes to children, whose parent or guardian are applying for this certification, that they must be born inside the U.S.

This person also made a statement that:

“In addition, we have the words of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother, who by the way NEVER said that Obama was born in Kenya.”

That is not true.

Listen for yourself to this interview that was recorded and was also to be used as evidence in a court of law, where Obama’s paternal grandmother says in no uncertain terms, when asked by the interviewer (and mind you this happened right after the election, in all the excitement, before this whole eligibility thing became a problem) that she was present at his birth:


Also listen to the Kenyan Ambassador, in an interview on The Mike in the Morning Show, over WRIF radio, in Detroit (which was recorded in November of 2008) right after the elections, where again in all the excitement, this Ambassadore admits that Obama was in fact born in Kenya:


This Ambassador to the United States, Peter Ogego, even admitted that it is a well known fact that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, and that plans are underway to build a memorial at the site of his birth.

Again this person wrote in their comments:

“Where do you get this vast amount of wrong information from? Obama’s first executive order made it HARDER for a president or a former president to seal records. Also, it applies ONLY to the federal presidential records, not to state birth certificate records (or in fact to any state records).”

My response is: in most every article or video that I use I also give a link so you can see where the document or video comes from.

You incorrectly state that Obama’s first executive order was to make it HARDER for a president or former president to seal his records.

Well that is just not true:


Read the Executive Order for yourself.

As you can read, in EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489, in Section 3; subsection D, it shows that the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign off on an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released?

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 21, 2009

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489
Executive Order — Presidential Records

Executive Order — Presidential Records

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Definitions.  For purposes of this order:

(a)  “Archivist” refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.

(b)  “NARA” refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.

(c)  “Presidential Records Act” refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.

(d)  “NARA regulations” refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.

(e)  “Presidential records” refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.

(f)  “Former President” refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.

(g)  A “substantial question of executive privilege” exists if NARA’s disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.

(h)  A “final court order” is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.

Sec. 2.  Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records.

(a)  When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.  However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist.  Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).  The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

(b)  Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice.  If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

Sec. 3.  Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President.

(a)  Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.

(b)  The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified.  The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.

(c)  If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.

(d)  If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates.  After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.

Sec. 4.  Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.

(a)  Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist’s determination as to whether to honor the former President’s claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege.  Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist’s determination with respect to the former President’s claim of privilege.

(b)  In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order.  The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations.  Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).  The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

Sec. 5.  General Provisions.

(a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 6.  Revocation.  Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 21, 2009

http://www.fas.org/sgp/obama/eo-13489.pdf

I thought Obama promised more openness and transparantency in government?


There are seven broken promises that Obama made in this speech, that he never once has fulfilled:

7 Broken Promises:

1. Make Government Open and Transparent
2. Make it “Impossible” for Congressmen to slip in Pork Barrel Projects
3. Meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public (republicans shut out)
4. No more secrecy
5. Public will have 5 days to look at a Bill
6. You’ll know what’s in it (Republican Senators didnt know)
7. We will put every pork barrel project online

You know none of this stuff is rocket science, but it’s just plain old common sense, as far as I can tell.

I mean you don’t have to be an attorney or any kind of genius to see the obvious discrepancies in this facsimile “Certification of Live Birth,” document that Obama is putting off as his official birth certificate.

I mean the differences are glaring; and it appears that most of America has taken stupid pills and cannot not see the obvious.

I don’t know, go figure. All I can do is present the evidence, and let you decide.

In the mean time, while we have an imposter at the helm of our country, who is not qualified, in my opinion; and apparently as you can see in the video (below), before he decided to run for office, neither did he consider himself to be qualified:


But nevertheless, this is the guy who is running our nation today, right into the ground; into a complete financial meltdown and failure; he is also the guy who is our commander in chief… may God help us!

Just pray, folks, that’s really and truly what we need more than anything right now, is for Christians in America to pray as per 2 Chronicles 7:14; that God would intervene and give us a miracle, to save our country, and restore our Constitutional Republic.

Shalom,

Skip Barland


Author: SPARKS FROM THE ANVIL OF LIFE

This is an open forum where we look into and investigate the Rhema Mysteries of God's Word; and also other issues of importance for our day and time.

17 thoughts on “Barack Hussein Obama… in one interview his grandmother called him “A son of Africa,” and in another she said that she was present at his birth! So which is it, was he born in Kenya, or in Hawaii?”

  1. Re: “according to Wikipedia going back as far as mid-December of 2008, even back then there were at least 17 lawsuits on record that had been filed challenging Obama’s eligibility, requesting that he be compelled to release additional documentation relating to his citizenship.”

    If Wikipedia said this, it is wrong. There has never been a lawsuit against Obama that simply asked for the birth certificate or for documents. By far most of them were to stop the election or stop the Electoral College from voting. There had never been a lawsuit just for the birth certificate. If there were, Obama would have provided the Certification of Live Birth, which is the OFFICIAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF HAWAII.

    As the Wall Street Journal put it: “In truth, Obama has proved that he is a native of Hawaii, and this proof would hold up in any legal or administrative proceeding.”

    And, it concluded: “Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.”

    1. When you say there has never been any lawsuits just asking for a valid birth certificate, it is a matter of public record that there have been many; though none so far has come to trial; except for the one with the Lt. Colonel.

      I have given you several news articles and have footnoted most of everthing I am saying with collaborating evidence. I would ask that you do that same.

      Don’t just say that the evidence doesn’t exist to support that this man is a fraud; just because you don’t want to believe it.

      For anyone to say that the “Certification of Life Birth” is the same as a “Long Form” birth certificate is just not true. It is missing a whole bunch of necessary information; and from the World Net Daily article I quoted, even there is a disagreement in Hawaii about the validity of that statement.

      You have but to look at what Obama is calling his proof of birth, along side of a long form birth cetificate, like the one every American has, and has had to use.

      No one would even get a U.S. Passport with this thing Obama is using, and hat is a fact!.

      Besides even the document that he is alleging to be his proof of citizenship, according to one expert, whose testimony I provided, it is a forgery and has been altered.

      Seriously most of this is just common sense, and anyone who has an impartial and open mind should be able to discern the truth from the lies.

      That’s just my opinion and it remains unchanged.

      Skip

    2. You say, regarding my statement and quote from Wikipedia that there are any number of lawsuits on record challenging Obama’s elgibilty, that it is wrong: “If Wikipedia said this, it is wrong. There has never been a lawsuit against Obama that simply asked for the birth certificate or for documents.”

      That is your opinion, but again it is not supported by the facts!!!

      These lawsuits, though none have actually gone to trial yet, except for the Lt. Col, who is also challenging Obama’s eligibility, but in any case there are any number of news reports that you can find online that talk about these various lawsuits, and besides it is a matter of public record:

      All the lawsuits are based on Obama’s Eligibility, based on his citizenship:

      Wikipedia says that numerous individuals and groups had filed state or federal lawsuits seeking to have Obama disqualified from standing or being confirmed for the Presidency of the United States, or to compel him to release additional documentation relating to his citizenship.

      By mid-December 2008, at least 17 lawsuits had been filed challenging Obama’s eligibility in states including North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Connecticut, New Jersey, Texas and Washington. No such suit had resulted in the grant of any relief to the plaintiffs by any court.

      A major obstacle to such citizen suits has been lack of standing, as the only plaintiff who was a presidential candidate or presidential elector was Alan Keyes.

      The importance of the doctrine of standing was explained by Judge R. Barclay Surrick of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in dismissing one suit.

      Berg v. Obama

      On August 21, 2008, Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg, a Democrat and former deputy state attorney general, filed a complaint alleging that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii, and was therefore a citizen of Kenya or possibly Indonesia, where he lived as a child.[134][135]

      He alleged that the “Certification of Live Birth” on Obama’s website is a forgery.

      Martin v. Lingle

      On October 17, 2008, another lawsuit was filed in a state circuit court of Hawaii[36] by Andy Martin.

      Martin’s lawsuit sought to order the state to release a copy of Sen. Obama’s long-form birth certificate.[36] The short-form birth certificate that the Obama campaign posted online states his place of birth as Honolulu, Hawaii.[36]

      Martin’s lawsuit claimed that because Martin “strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research”, he should have a copy of Obama’s birth certificate from the state and not a certificate “posted on a Web site”.

      In October 2008, Leo Donofrio, an attorney from New Jersey,[145] filed suit to challenge the eligibility of Obama,

      Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz

      On October 31, 2008, Greenwich resident and health-food-store owner Cort Wrotnowski filed a suit in the Connecticut Supreme Court challenging the authenticity of presidential candidate Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate. The suit was dismissed after initial hearings.[149]

      Keyes v. Bowen

      Alan Keyes and Markham Robinson, chairman of the American Independent Party and a California candidate for president elector, filed a lawsuit on November 14, 2008 requesting that Obama provide documentation that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.[153][154][155][156]

      Keyes also said in an interview that he would not be in favor of amending this requirement of the Constitution.[157]

      Keyes asserts that statements by Obama’s paternal step-grandmother “raise doubts as to whether Barack Obama is in fact a natural born U.S. citizen, eligible to be president.” [63][158][159]

      In December 2008, Steve Ankeny and Bill Kruse filed a “Petition for Extraordinary Writ of Prohibition” against the Governor of Indiana to block “any popular votes for Barack Obama and Joe Biden for the appointment as Chief Electors [sic].” A hearing was held, and on March 16, 2009 the Governor’s motion to dismiss was granted.

      The Plaintiffs appealed the ruling to the Indiana Court of Appeals, which upheld it on November 12, 2009.[163]

      The appellate decision addressed the question of whether Obama’s eligibility was affected by his father’s lack of U.S. citizenship, saying that “[b]ased upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”[164]

      Kerchner v. Obama

      Attorney Mario Apuzzo, on behalf of Charles Kerchner and other plaintiffs, sued Obama, the U.S. Congress, Dick Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi in January 2009 alleging Obama was ineligible to be president, and that Congress failed to verify Obama’s ineligibility.

      Barnett v. Obama

      On the afternoon of January 20, 2009, Orly Taitz filed a lawsuit in federal court, Alan Keyes et al v. Barack H. Obama et al against Obama, with Wiley Drake as one of the named parties.

      The case is currently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[176]

      Hollister v. Soetoro

      On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as “Barry Soetoro”, the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school).

      On February 1, 2009, Stefan F. Cook, a Major in the United States Army Reserve, contacted Taitz via e-mail, asking to be part of her lawsuit.

      On May 8, he volunteered to serve for one year in Afghanistan beginning on July 15, 2009.[178] The Army accepted his offer and ordered him to report on that date.[178] On July 8, however, he filed suit, with Taitz as his lawyer, seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector, arguing that his deployment orders were invalid because Obama was not a natural-born U.S. citizen, and therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

      Rhodes v. Macdonald

      In September 2009, Taitz, on behalf of Captain Connie Rhodes, a U.S. Army physician, sought a restraining order to stop Rhodes’ forthcoming deployment to Iraq. In the request for a restraining order, Taitz argued the order was illegal since Obama was illegally serving as President.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories

  2. Re: “the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign off on an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released?”

    Answer: The first executive order made it harder for a president to seal records than the executive order issued by George Bush. Harder to seal, not easier. And, it applies only to federal presidential documents. It does not, and cannot apply to state records (which were and remain private, not sealed) and to college records (which were and remain private, not sealed) and private business records such as lists of lawyers’ clients (which were and remain private, not sealed). Obama has, however, shown the official birth certificate of Hawaii, showing that he was born in Hawaii, and the officials from Hawaii have confirmed the facts on that document twice, and recently the governor of Hawaii did too.

  3. Re: “Then there is the pending case of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, a medical doctor in the U.S. Army (who is in his 18th year of service). He is being court marshaled for refusing to accept orders to return to Afghanistan, based on this whole ineligibility issue of the Commander in Chief…’

    This is a military criminal case, not a lawsuit, and it is a case against Lakin, not against Obama. In this case, Lakin is asking for documents, but he is not entitled to them because the issue is simply whether or not he obeyed a legal order. The order was legal because it was given by a full Col., a superior to Lt. Col. Lakin, and it is a legal order because the Afghanistan War is a legal war, approved by the US Congress in 2001.

  4. Re: ” if I were being challenged as to my place of birth, and whether or not I were a United State’s citizen, I would just pay the $10 to have my “long form” official birth certificate released. What’s the big deal?”

    Answer. The Certification of Live Birth is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii. And, it is the only birth certificate or birth document of any kind that Hawaii has issued since 2001. What is the big deal?

    As the Wall Street Journal put it: “Further, if Congress were to pass the so-called birther bill, Obama would be able to comply easily. The bill would require presidential campaigns to submit “a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate” to the Federal Election Commission. The certificate Obama has released publicly would meet this requirement.”

    In other words, Obama has shown exactly the same document that the Republicans in the US Congress are asking for, and in this case the officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on it twice, and there is a witness saying that she was told of Obama’s birth in 1961 and wrote home about it, and the Kenyan grandmother also said that Obama was born in Hawaii.

  5. What you say about the “Certification of Live Birth” being all there is that is used as proof of U.S. Citizenship in Hawaii, I don’t believe for a minute that is true. Even though I know someone said that, in Hawaii; but again as I reported in the WND article someone else in a different department said otherwise.

    The obvious truth is it can’t be because it doesn’t contain enough inforamation on it in order to varify its validity. It doesn’t even have a signature on it!!!

    Did you not see the”Long Form” Birth Certificate (above) that was issued in Hawaii in 1963?

    That is what my birth certificate looks like and everyone elses; and it has signatures and an embossed stamp; it also has the name of my hospital where I was born; and all the other information that I itemized above, all of which is missing from this poor excuse fjor a birth certificate that Obama wants us to believe is his proof of U.S. Citizenship.

    Even as you read the statue, which I quoted (also above), regarding how one applies for a “Certification of Live Birth,” you can readily see that no were does it even ask for proof that the person or child is born in the U.S.; it only ask that they provide proof that they reside in Hawaii.

    The only reason why Congress has given Obama a pass on all of this, and why they didn’t vet him, is because, as was aledge from the evidence provided in the WND article (above), both Nancy Pelosi and I believe also Harry Reid, are both complicit in the cover up; as Obama was the person of choice, selected by the the Globalist Oligarchy, that makes up the people who run our banks and control our media, because of his liberal tendencies. He is their man to bring about the New World Order, here in the U.S.; as was Bush, the Clintons; and also Bush Sr.

    Obama, as I have said before, is a Trojan Horse; and because he happens to be a minority, supposedly the first Black President, but even that is a lie; because as I’ve point out in a previous blog, he is over 63% Arab; he is 50% White, and he is only about 6% African.

    How people can just ignore all these evidence and swallow this malarkey is just beyond me; but they do.

    It happens I guess because most of the news media, unlike they were with Sarah Palin, when they were just manufacturing lies; for Obama they just look the other way and ignore the mountain of lies behind this guy; and they just let him say and do whatever he pleases; which again is evidence again that the bulk of the media in the U.S. are also bought and paid for, as much of our Congress is, and this man who sits in the White House, which I won’t call him a president, because I do not believe he is constitutionally qualified.

    Also, by the way, on the subject of this “Certification of Live Birth,” as stated above, according to WND, there are people who have this same certification who are known to have been born outside of the United States.

  6. Re: “he is over 63% Arab; he is 50% White, and he is only about 6% African.”

    (This adds up to more than 100%, but I presume that you mean that the 63% refers to that percent of the father’s side.)

    Not that it matters, but where do you get this crap from? You probably know that Arabs have hooked noses, and Africans have broad flat noses. Does Obama’s nose look hooked to you? Does his father’s nose looked hooked? Does it look broad and flat?

    As I said, it doesn’t matter, except to the extent that whomever told you “63% Arab” is as reliable as whomever told you that Obama was a citizen of Indonesia. And whomever told you that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya (She said that he was born in HAWAII).

  7. The National Review said: “The theory that Obama was born in Kenya, that he was smuggled into the U.S., and that his parents somehow hoodwinked Hawaiian authorities into falsely certifying his birth in Oahu, is crazy stuff.”

    And here is one reason why, as a conservative columnist in Hawaii put it: “For Obama to have been born in Kenya, Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. would have had to fly from Honolulu to Mombasa, give birth in a substandard third world hospital, fly back and then somehow arrange for a fraudulent birth certificate to be entered by the State of Hawai’i on August 8, 1961 (at the time governed by Republican William Quinn). They would have also somehow planted the phony birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser (at the time edited by Republican Thurston Twigg-Smith) and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin. Hawai’i’s current Republican Governor Linda Lingle would also have to be complicit in the cover-up as would all of the leftist 1960s University of Hawaii friends of Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr—among them US Rep Neil Abercrombie.

    In 1961, the roundtrip flight to Kenya would have been a very expensive, pointless, and time consuming epic journey for two starving students. Barack Obama Sr. had only been able to come study at UH Manoa with a free ticket on a donated charter flight with other Kenyan students.” (http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34565)..

    The same conservative columnist, Andrew Walden, also wrote: “Obama’s birth certificate posted online is exactly the same birth certificate everybody in Hawaii gets from the State Department of Health. It is not forged. There is nothing unusual about the design or the texture. In addition to the birth certificate, the August 13, 1961 Honolulu Advertiser also carries an announcement of Obama’s birth. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin also carries the same announcement. Both papers printed an identical list of birth announcements supplied to them by the Hawaii State Department of Health. Conspiracists have made much of the fact that the Territory of Hawaii gave a phony birth certificate in 1904 to Chinese republican leader Sun Yat Sen for diplomatic reasons. But the modern State of Hawaii has never supplied Certification of Live Birth indicating US birth for foreign-born children.”

    Getting back to the Kenya myth. Here is another reason why Obama was not born in Kenya.

    If a person were born in Kenya, she or he would need a US travel document to get to the USA. That would be either a US visa on a foreign passport or the change to his mother’s US passport to include him. One or the other would have had to have been applied for at a US Consulate in Kenya and granted before the child would be allowed to enter the USA.

    If such a document existed, it would be easy to find because the records of the application for the visa or for the change to the mother’s passport would still be in the files of the US State Department, filed under applications for visas and applications for changes to passports in Kenya in 1961. The Republicans were in charge of the US State Department until January 2009. No such document has been found. No such document exists.

    Obama was not born in Kenya. He was born in Hawaii, as his official birth certificate from Hawaii shows, and the facts on it were repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii. Obama has already posted a copy of the official birth certificate, the Certification of Live Birth, which is the only birth document that Hawaii has been sending out since 2001. Hawaii no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate, only of the official birth certificate: The Certification of Live Birth.

  8. Re: “The obvious truth is it can’t be because it doesn’t contain enough inforamation on it in order to varify its validity. It doesn’t even have a signature on it!!!”

    The signature of the official is on the back, with the seal, where they are both supposed to be. You can see the signature and the seal in the excellent photos on FactCheck’s site. The idea that FactCheck could forge that detailed document and the special security paper is absurd.

    Thus there is an official birth certificate from Hawaii, and the facts on it were confirmed twice. Yes, there was one guy, Adams, who worked for the election department, who said that there was no birth certificate. But he said that four months ago, and NO ONE HAS CONFIRMED WHAT HE SAID. And, the officials in Hawaii have said that Adams did not have access to the birth certificate files, so he was either speculating or lying.

  9. Re: “there are people who have this same certification who are known to have been born outside of the United States.”

    As Andrew Walden, a conservative columnist in Hawaii said , the modern state of Hawaii does not give Certifications of Live Birth that say on them “born in Hawaii” unless there was proof that the child WAS born in Hawaii.

    Yes, Hawaii gives certifications of live birth to people who were born outside of Hawaii, but those certifications must have the actual place of birth on them. Thus, they can give a certification to the child of Hawaii citizens even if they were visiting in Boise, Idaho. But, guess what? The certification would say on it: “Hawaii Certification of Live Birth, Place of Birth: Boise, Idaho.”

    In contrast, Obama’s Certification says on it that he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.

    This should hardly be surprising because the original in the files also says that he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. That is the document that the clerk copied off when she or he filled in the computer form that produced the Certification, and that is what the officials in Hawaii and the governor of Hawaii have confirmed.

  10. You keep asking me where I get my information from? Well if you read my blog then you know already because most every article or statement I make, along with it I also give you a a footnote reference or a link to follow.

    You on the other hand seem to make most of your assertions off the cuff, because it is what you want to believe. Why don’t you show me your sources… if you have any.

    Irregardless, as I have said before this whole controversy, in my view, is really just about common sense; and truly in my view you have to bend over backward or have blinders on not to be able to discern the truth from fiction.

    As far as Obama’s Certification of Live birth is concerned, it is obviously not even close to an official birth certificate and it doesn’t even contained a quarter of the information that is on the Long form, that is absolutely necessary in order to determine citizenship.

    Obama’s Certification of Live Birth isn’t even signed; and it doesn’t have an embossed seal or stamp on it, to begin with; and it is so poorly done that even I could make one on my computer, that looks better.

    It is obviously a forgery and that assertions is according to an expert on the subject:

    Regarding my statement that Barack Hussein Obama is Arabic, that would be determined by his father’s ancestral bloodline.

    It is reported that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (Obama’s father) was only 1/4% Black, and that he always identified himself as a Kenyan Arab.

    Also, and this is according to how the British would have recorded him in their documents back then, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. would have been ‘Arab’.”

    Also, if Obama was born in Kenya in 1961, as alledged, then he would be a British subject, because Kenya’s independence from Great Britain didn’t take place until 1963.

    But that’s okay, you are free to believe as you wish; however judging from Obama’s rapidly declining approval ratings in the polls, apparently most people are getting hip to the fact that this guy is nothing but a fraud!

  11. Re: “Obama’s rapidly declining approval ratings in the polls.”

    Quite a few US-born presidents have had rapidly declining approval ratings. Obama is just another US-born president with rapidly declining approval ratings.

  12. The real threat to our liberty are people you don’t hear about,, whose faces are hidden from the cameras and lights of public scrutiny; but the end goal of these people is to ultimately collapse our economy and force us to accept their “New World Order.”

    Obama is but a puppet on a string, as was Bush before him, Clinton before him, and also Bush Sr., before him; and regardless of whether we are talking about the Republican or Democratic parties, owed to the fact that these bankers have people on both sides; and so at least from the standpoint of those who direct and control both parties, partisan politics aside, both parties are on the same page when it comes to the Globalist agenda of taking the world into a “New World Order.”

    We know from Bible prophecy that this will ultimately become the One Word Government that we read about in Revelation 13, where after they establish this one world government, there will also be a one world monetary system that the Bible says will be a mark on the either the forehead or right hand.

    We now know that this mark will be a micro chip that will be inserted under the skin; and without that chip you will not be able to buy or sell; just as the Bible says.

    These Globalist Bankers are the people who are our biggest threat; and until recently you never heard about them; and that’s because they have had enough money and power to buy their anonymity, and stay out of view; but that is changing today, thanks primarily to the internet; which will probably mean that they will be accelerating their agenda; and Obama is their man to bring that about.

    Part 1 of 3

    Part 2 of 3

    Part 3 of 3

    I love my country and I don’t want to see us become a part of this evil system; but if we are to avoid it, then “We the People” are going to have to band together and take back our government; and reestablish our Constitutional Republic!

  13. Re: “The real threat to our liberty are people you don’t hear about,, whose faces are hidden from the cameras and lights of public scrutiny; but the end goal of these people is to ultimately collapse our economy and force us to accept their “New World Order.”

    Answer, what does this have to do with the fact that Obama was born in Hawaii? That is where he was born. He has shown his official birth certificate to prove it. The officials in Hawaii, the original clerk who filled in the form, the two officials of the department of health and department of vital records, and the Republican governor, have all confirmed that he was born in Hawaii. So did his Kenyan grandmother and this witness http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495.ece

  14. Well for people who have a Biblical perceptive, based on Bible prophecy for the last days, it is obvious; but I can tell after our correspondence and with your comments that you are not in that camp.

    I think you would do well to study your Bible and look particularly at the prophecy for the last days.

    You would do well also to study history, because what is happening in the U.S. today is not that different from what happened in pre-Nazi Germany.

    I remember hearing these theories after 9/11 about how certain “shadow” elements within our own government were complicit in the 9/11 incident.

    My first reaction was to dismiss that whole idea as ridiculous; but I honestly have to say today that I’m not so sure.

    As I said, I think it is very important that we remember what happened in pre-Nazi Germany that gave rise to Hitler; because something very similar is happening here in our country today, that I believe will ultimately give rise to the Antichrist.

    For instance, we now know that there were elements in the pre-Nazi era German government who were involved in various internal terrorist events/attacks on the German people, for the purpose of declaring martial law and bypassing the people’s constitution, in order to seize power.

    As it happened, as a compromise the outgoing president Paul von Hindenburg, before his death, declared Hitler as Chancellor of Germany.

    With martial law in force, following Hindenburg’s death, Hitler immediately merged the presidency with the office of Chancellor under the title of Leader and Chancellor (Führer und Reichskanzler), making himself Germany’s Head of State and Head of government.

    Whereas I don’t for a moment believe our whole government would have been complicit in such an awful thing, however I do believe now that there are people in very high places in our government, including former presidents and this current one, who at the very least are totally committed to this Globalist agenda for a “New World Order,” as they have admitted as much; and as I have said before, this coming New World Order will be a totalitarian dictatorship; and that cannot happen in our country with our Constitutional rights intact. Also, all of these people who are committed to this Globalist agenda, whether they recognize it or not, they are operating in Satan’s camp, so anything is possible.

    Things are a bit more complicated than what most believe, and history records; and remember also this agenda and plan to bring the world under a one world rulership has been going on for many many years; and really it all started back in ancient Babylon, where we are now again, not so coincidentally; when God confused the languages of the world. I assume you do know that Iraq is the land of ancient Babylon.

    Well Satan has been trying ever since the tower of Babel to put it back together; and if you are a believer who reads the Bible, as I do, then you know that in the last days, in the not too distant future, he will succeed in doing just that.

    We know from the Bible that like Hitler, who was one of history’s antichrist archetypes, the Antichrist will have great charisma & speaking ability, just as Obama has, and also “a mouth speaking great things”.

    Obama, I believe, at the very least is an instrument to bring about this New World Order; and if he is not the Antichrist, then I can only say he is certainly a prelude to him.

    My point is, I just don’t want to see the U.S. become a part of this “New World Order,” nor this coming Antichrist government!

    I’ve said this before that Obama is a puppet on a string; and in that role, he is not working for the American people at all; but he is working for the ones who put him in office.

    Consequently, because of that fact, it is very important that we resolve this matter regarding Obama’s eligibility to even be President.

    This should be obvious by how many of the things Obama is doing that are absolutely unconstitutional!

    Your arguments, for me anyway and for many more people, do not hold water at all; and what you are saying about how this sad excuse for a birth certificate that Obama has, in this Certification of Live Birth, and how it is a legitimate document is laughable.

    All I can say is, if you don’t believe this, or if you can’t see or understand what all of this has to do with Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility as president, then I hate to say this, but you are exactly like many of the people in the 30’s, in pre-Nazi Germany, who just sat ideally by and allowed Hitler to come into power.

    If you seriously don’t understand any of this, or what the importance is, I recommend you read your Bible, and also our U.S. Constitution.

    One thing you will learn from the Bible, is that history does repeat itself; and one of the things that becomes clear is that the same scenario that allowed for Hitler’s rise to power will once again be repeated that will give rise to the Antichrist coming into power; and the Bible also says, regarding the Antichrist, that MANY people, and even some Christians, will be deceived by him.

    I only hope you and those like you wake up before it’s too late. This is not about race and this is not about partisan politics, this is about Americans coming together as one to take back our country, in order to restore our Constitutional Republic!

    It’s also about what sort of country and what sorts of problems we are leaving to our children; and whether the America we know and love will even exist in the future!

    On that note, I’ll just leave you with the following quote: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing” (Edmund Burke).

  15. Re: “it is very important that we resolve this matter regarding Obama’s eligibility to even be President.’

    Answer: Obama was elected by the Electoral College without a single member changing her or his vote from the votes of the popular election. Not one. And this was despite a campaign by birthers and two-fers to have them change their votes. The US Congress confirmed Obama’s election UNANIMOUSLY. Not one member changed her or his vote to vote against. Not one. And not one even said later: “I shouldn’t have voted that way. I have changed my mind.” And this was despite a campaign by birthers and two-fers to have them change their votes. Obama was sworn in by the Chief Justice of the United States.

    Obama has proven that he was born in Hawaii with the official birth certificate of the state, and the facts on it have been confirmed twice by the officials in Hawaii, and most recently by the governor of Hawaii.

    This matter has been resolved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s