What are we to do regarding this very real threat of Islam in our country?

In a Constitutional Republic ALL citizens are treated

equally under the Law, which law is our U.S. Constitution!

The following was forwarded to me today by a friend, and I really believe we need to adopt this, or an equally wise approach, in dealing with this very real and dangerous Islamic problem that we have today; but we need to do so without compromising or infringing upon the First Amendment Rights of anyone, who is a LEGAL U.S. Citizen.

Interesting point of view from a Texas friend of mine.  Could this work in Murfeesboro, TN?  Jim

One of the key things I see, is not the legality or constitutionality of whether or not they have a legal right to build the Islamic Victory Monument at the site of their victory on 9-11.

It is purely the absolute nastiness and ugliness of the Muslims in general as being neighbors.

Every country they have immigrated Islam into, they have begun subverting the culture, and as their numbers grow, they become more confrontational and aggressive.

A particularly nasty group of Muslims wanted to build such an Islamic Cultural Center in Katy, TX in the Houston suburbs.

They bought the land in the semi-rural area where livestock was still permitted.

They had barely broken ground when they started complaining about the cattle and horses on the property next to theirs.

They picked on the WRONG man, who was a Vietnam Era Vet and had an attitude.  He countered with complaining to them about their proposed sound system that broadcasted the Islamic Call to Prayer 5 times a day, and said since he was a Christian, that it offended him, and he demanded they eliminate it from their plans or at least keep the volume low so it wouldn’t violate his property!

They left in a huff and returned a few days later with a lawyer.

He did a little more zoning research and found that he could raise PIGS on his property, legally!

He then decided that he would follow their Islamic calendar and on every holiday, would hold public Pig Races and a good pork BBQ event!!!

Perfectly LEGAL, but he only returned the neighborliness that was extended to him by the Muslims.

Daniel, a good friend, and fellow Southern troublemaker, and I were going to sponsor a pig that would be trained to race.

The Pig Races are a Texas State Fair tradition and are very entertaining. But alas, it seems that the Warriors of Islam had a change of heart about the location of their Islamic Cultural Center!

I would LOVE to see the Southern Pork BBQ Hall of Fame and Cultural Center in NYC across the street from the Cordoba House Islamic Victory Monument!

It could be the very Embassy of the South with the magnificent African-American BBQ pit Masters guest cooking in the restaurant and holding seminars on the finer points of BBQ’ing the noble and beloved Swine!

BTW…  did you know the significance of the name Cordoba House?

Cordoba, Spain was conquered by the Muslims in the 1200’s and the Catholic Cathedral was reduced to rubble and a Mosque was built on the ruins of the cathedral!!

Interesting, isn’t it?  Muslims have a thing about building on top of conquered nations’ symbolic places.

Know what the Dome of the Rock is sitting on?

Solomon’s Temple and the former home of the Ark of the Covenant among other Christian and Jewish relics.

Hey, folks, it’s all legal!

The moral of this story is that we need more real Texans weighing in on this mess!

We’ll straighten out these misguided individuals, post haste!


No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” ~ Thomas Jefferson

Islam technically is not a religion, but rather it is a very narrow minded and radical ideology, one that denies people who are ruled by it their basic rights and freedom of choice; it is also very repressive, as it persecutes and often times murders all those who disagree with it.

With that being said, pursuant to our First Amendment Rights under our U.S. Constitution, ALL legitimate and legally recognized religions and faiths, by law (meaning according to our U.S. Constitution) must be treated equally, and that would even include the church of satan; because in a free society you cannot deny equal rights and protection to one, and not to the other, without subverting and endangering the rights to all.

That’s the difference between operation under a democracy and a constitutional republic.

Under a democracy the majority who votes rules, and the majority can deny those rights to any one minority they wish; but when you have that paper barrier called our U.S. Constitution as the highest law of the land, all must bow to it, and conform; and be treated equally under the law.

This protects the rights of the minority against the tyranny and discrimination from the majority; which was the intent of our founding fathers.

After all the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment reads as follows:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Today if it happens to be a cult who is being denied their First Amendment rights, there will inevitably be many in the church who would cheer such a thing; however I believe it is a mistake to do so, because tomorrow it could be a Christian Church that is being denied their First Amendment Rights; as truly many are today under this repressive and anti-Christian and anti-Constitutional political environment in which we live.

I believe something like this (as this guy from Texas did) or something similar would actually work, if only we would do it; and something like this could be done without denying anyone’s Constitutional Rights.

The only other alternative, in my view as a way to handle this radical Islamification movement in the U.S., would be to have it declared through legislation and through our courts, not as a religion, but rather as an anti-American and anti-Constitutional, subversive movement, which I totally believe that it is; and treat it as any other political movement, such as the American Communist Party.

The ONLY exceptions that has been allowed in the past, prior to this current liberal and so called “Progressive” attitude/movement that is today so prevalent in our legislature and in our courts today, which would allow any sort of compromise on our Constitutional rights, has only happened when such action has been shown to be in the best interest of the public good and/or safety; or in the event of national security.

For instance freedom of speech stops and no longer applies when one shouts “fire” in a crowded public theater, where no fire exists; or in times of war, where freedom of press has been curtailed in order to prevent news papers from printing the travel schedules of the various shipping lines.

I believe as with all things in life, we have but to turn to the Bible for examples and ideas, as to how we are to handle problems, even one such as this. I truly think that Elijah had the right idea.

As you can see in the above video, I believe in applying Elijah’s approach to this Islamic problem, as he displayed on Mt. Carmel, before the eyes of Israel, against the Priest of Baal, who by the way are the predecessors of what we call today, Islam.

The worship of Allah is not the worship of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob at all; but Allah is a demonic entity, known also as the “Moon God”, ergo the crescent moon in their symbol, and this was also what Baal worship was all about… and both are tied to the same demon god, which is a false god!

Personally, I don’t believe we ever have to be fearful of these sorts of demonic movements in a free society, as long as the truth is told and ideals and doctrines, or ideologies, are honestly aired and debated openly in a public forum.

This will always work in a free society where truth is allowed to prevail and be expressed; because all you have to do every time you are confronted by a subversive group and its idealolgy, such as with Islam, is expose them in the light of day, and put their stuff out in the open for all to see, including their long history of murder and mayhem; their radical and narrow-minded agenda, and beliefs; and just let everyone see the truth for what it is… and by so doing just turn on the Light, and the darkness dissipates every time.

Besides, as Elijah said, in the Skip paraphrase version of the Bible: “If Allah be God then let Allah show his stuff!!!”

Anyway, that’s my opinion.


Skip Barland

An Irish blessing is coming your way today…

An Irish Blessing for you!!!

(Click on link above)

My thanks to my friend Janice for passing the above link along to me this morning, and so I’m passing it along to you in the hope that your day may be blessed and full of the joy and shalom peace of our Lord, including not just His peace, but also provision, and health, with nothing lacking or missing. 

In Yeshua’s name… Amen!!!

Skip Barland

The history behind Saint Patrick’s Breastplate:
It is a Christian hymn whose original Old Irish lyrics were traditionally attributed to Saint Patrick during his Irish ministry in the 5th century; however, it was probably actually written later, in the 8th century. It is written in the style of a druidic incantation for protection on a journey; and is part of the Liber Hymnorum, a collection of hymns found in two manuscripts kept in Dublin.
The words were translated into English verse by Cecil Frances Alexander in 1889 and set to two traditional Irish tunes, St. Patrick and Deirdre.
The hymn, also known by its opening line “I bind unto myself today”, is currently included in the English Hymnal, the Irish Church Hymnal and The Hymnal (1982) of the U.S. Episcopal Church.

It is often sung during the celebration of the Feast of Saint Patrick on or near March 17, as well as on Trinity Sunday.

The prayer known as “Faeth Fiada,” or the “Lorica of St. Patrick” (St. Patrick’s Breast-Plate) was first edited by Petrie in his “History of Tara”.

Scripture references may include Ephesians 6:10-17 (“God’s shield to protect me … from snares of devils”).

Saint Patricks BreastplatePrayer

I bind unto myself today
The strong Name of the Trinity,
By invocation of the same,
The Three in One and One in Three.

I bind this day to me for ever.
By power of faith, Christ’s incarnation;
His baptism in the Jordan river;
His death on Cross for my salvation;
His bursting from the spicèd tomb;
His riding up the heavenly way;
His coming at the day of doom;
I bind unto myself today.

I bind unto myself the power
Of the great love of the cherubim;
The sweet ‘well done’ in judgment hour,
The service of the seraphim,
Confessors’ faith, Apostles’ word,
The Patriarchs’ prayers, the Prophets’ scrolls,
All good deeds done unto the Lord,
And purity of virgin souls.

I bind unto myself today
The virtues of the starlit heaven,
The glorious sun’s life-giving ray,
The whiteness of the moon at even,
The flashing of the lightning free,
The whirling wind’s tempestuous shocks,
The stable earth, the deep salt sea,
Around the old eternal rocks.

I bind unto myself today
The power of God to hold and lead,
His eye to watch, His might to stay,
His ear to hearken to my need.
The wisdom of my God to teach,
His hand to guide, His shield to ward,
The word of God to give me speech,
His heavenly host to be my guard.

Against the demon snares of sin,
The vice that gives temptation force,
The natural lusts that war within,
The hostile men that mar my course;
Or few or many, far or nigh,
In every place and in all hours,
Against their fierce hostility,
I bind to me these holy powers.

Against all Satan’s spells and wiles,
Against false words of heresy,
Against the knowledge that defiles,
Against the heart’s idolatry,
Against the wizard’s evil craft,
Against the death wound and the burning,
The choking wave and the poisoned shaft,
Protect me, Christ, till Thy returning.

Christ be with me, Christ within me,
Christ behind me, Christ before me,
Christ beside me, Christ to win me,
Christ to comfort and restore me.
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ in quiet, Christ in danger,
Christ in hearts of all that love me,
Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

I bind unto myself the Name,
The strong Name of the Trinity;
By invocation of the same.
The Three in One, and One in Three,
Of Whom all nature hath creation,
Eternal Father, Spirit, Word:
Praise to the Lord of my salvation,
Salvation is of Christ the Lord.

God’s covenant with Abraham and the TRUTH behind the Israeli Palestinian conflict, which is an age old blood feud between two brothers… the descendents of Isaac and Ishmael!

The Bible says of father Abraham that:

“He believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.”

(Genesis 15:6)

God has decreed that father Abraham be the example of FAITH that God looks for as the bases for relationship between Himself and His offspring, of all those who are in covenant relationship with Him, who are created in His image and after His likeness, of those who are the descendants of Adam’s seed!

In Genesis 17 we read where God says to father Abraham:

I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you.

And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.

Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”

And in Zechariah we read of what we know today as the Israeli Palestinian Conflict:

Zechariah 12

The Coming Deliverance of Judah

1 The burden[a] of the word of the LORD against Israel. Thus says the LORD, who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him: 2 “Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of drunkenness to all the surrounding peoples, when they lay siege against Judah and Jerusalem. 3 And it shall happen in that day that I will make Jerusalem a very heavy stone for all peoples; all who would heave it away will surely be cut in pieces, though all nations of the earth are gathered against it.

4 In that day,” says the LORD, “I will strike every horse with confusion, and its rider with madness; I will open My eyes on the house of Judah, and will strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, ‘The inhabitants of Jerusalem are my strength in the LORD of hosts, their God.’

6 In that day I will make the governors of Judah like a firepan in the woodpile, and like a fiery torch in the sheaves; they shall devour all the surrounding peoples on the right hand and on the left, but Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place—Jerusalem.

7 “The LORD will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem shall not become greater than that of Judah.

8 In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; the one who is feeble among them in that day shall be like David, and the house of David shall be like God, like the Angel of the LORD before them. 9 It shall be in that day that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

In the next verses we learn how Israel will recognize her Messiah, and will mourn for the Pierced One

10 “And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn.

11 In that day there shall be a great mourning in Jerusalem, like the mourning at Hadad Rimmon in the plain of Megiddo.[b]
12 And the land shall mourn, every family by itself: the family of the house of David by itself, and their wives by themselves; the family of the house of Nathan by itself, and their wives by themselves; 13 the family of the house of Levi by itself, and their wives by themselves; the family of Shimei by itself, and their wives by themselves; 14 all the families that remain, every family by itself, and their wives by themselves.

Question: When did Israel pierce her Messiah?

For the answer let’s look to the Prophet Daniel, chapter 9:24-27; and please pay close attention to this prophecy, as it will literally blow your mind—as it is a mathematical prophecy that counts to the very day from the decree that was given to rebuild Jerusalem after 70 years of Babylonian captivity, until Messiah would be cut off—meaning killed—for the sins of His people:

Now let’s look to what the Bible prophesied regarding the descendants of Ishmael, and then look around you at the Arab Israeli conflict, as it exists today!

This is what the Bible says of the descendants of Ishmael:

Genesis 16:12
And he (Ishmael) will be a wild man; his hand [will be] against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

Here Dennis Prager gives us a look at the truth behind this conflict between the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael today:

This is where it ALL started, in a covenant which God made with father Abraham:

Genesis 17

The Sign of the Covenant

1 When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am Almighty God; walk before Me and be blameless. 2 And I will make My covenant between Me and you, and will multiply you exceedingly.”

3 Then Abram fell on his face, and God talked with him, saying: 4 “As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations.

5 No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations.

6 I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you. 7 And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.

8 Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”

Let the nations of the world be forewarned for the Bible says clearly that any nation or people that comes against or threatens the nation of Israel in any way is bringing God’s judgment and a curse upon themselves; as God’s promise was to bless all those who blessed Abraham’s descendants, and to curse all those who would curse her! Selah


Skip Barland

Our Two-Party system are as two sides of the same coin… and both are taking us towards a “New World Order!” Join the Republic and restore our Constitutional Government; also listen to the weekly Republic Conference Call recorded November 11, 2010.

I pledge allegiance to the Republic!

Listen to the weekly Republic Conference Call

Each segment will automatically sequence to the next, or you can fast forward through the segments manually as you like.

(Recorded November 10, 2010)

Most of our country’s citizens today are operating under the misconception that if you merely change the political mixture in Washington DC by voting in a different party, be it Democrat or Republican, that they have accomplished an effective change in the direction of our government… this is not so!!!

History will prove that whereas partisan politics will vary back and forth down certain political lines, however nothing of any consequence ever really changes in this two party system to remove the corrupt outside and foreign influence and leaven that has for over 139 years corrupted our political system.

Whereas sure you will have a different sort of rhetoric and there will be some partisan changes that will occur, back and forth between right and left depending on which party happens to be in power and has the votes to effect those changes; but the one thing that always remains unchanged is that the same evil oligarchy is still in control from behind the scenes, who are forever subverting and corrupting our political system, and making their backroom, closed door deals, as our country is moved by both political parties down the same path towards what the Globalist International Bankers have defined as their “New World Order.”

Now mind you this concept was first introduced publically by a “Conservative Republican” President, in the person of George H.W. Bush, in a speech which he gave back in 1991; and it has been the secret agenda of both parties (Democrat and Republican), at least from the standpoint of their party leadership, to bring this “New World Order” about.

These are the changes that have happened over the years that have undermined and have corrupted our political process and our Constitutional Republic:

  1. From the very beginning of the formation of our Constitutional Republic there have been foreign banking interests who have sought to gain a foothold in our internal banking system; and our founding fathers all warned us against allowing that to happen.
  2. Whereas the united states of America started out as a Constitutional Republic in 1776, made up of “We the People,” as the only sovereigns; and the central “Federal” government operated only as outlined in our U.S. Constitution, with the true power belonging to the individual States of the Republic; all of that changed coming out of the Civil War, as the united states Republic was bankrupt and was then seeking to gain a loan from the Rothschild’s Banking Cartel.
  3. Using that leverage of bankruptcy, and our desperate need for funds, these International Bankers, headed by the Rothschilds, finally got their foot in the door; and on February 21, 1871 the Forty-First Congress (Ref: Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62), with no Constitutional authority to do so, passed “an act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia.” This is also known as the “Act of 1871.”

    In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner.

    With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

    “The Constitution for the united states of America”.

    The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

  4. On October 6, 1917 the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT was submitted to Congress by Woodrow Wilson and was passed during World War I. The purpose of this ACT was to define,
    regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for other purposes.”

    With this Act Congress defined WHO the enemy was. It also gave the government total authority over the individuals defined as the “enemy”.

    In the definition of enemy there was an exception in Section 2, Subdivision (c). It was: “other than citizens of the United States.”

    In Section 5(b) of this same Act it states:

    “That the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, export or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any form (other that credits relating solely to transactions to be executed wholly within the United States).”

  5. On March 9, 1933 President Franklin Roosevelt signed into law the EMERGENCY BANKING ACT, which called for a special and extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038.

    At that session he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the existing national ’emergency’ in banking and for other purposes.

    In this Act of March 9, 1933, it states in Title 1 Section 1:

    “The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.

    This says that any actions, orders or proclamations, made by the President hereafter taken, are hereby approved and confirmed.

    Congress just wrote a blank check to the President to do ANYTHING he wants to do, and it is approved, IN ADVANCE!

    Do you think we are living under a dictatorship!

    Isn’t that how the President is acting today, as if everything he does is already approved?

    If you went to a law library today and looked up 12 USC (United States Code) Section 95(b), you will find this Act still on the books today!

    But, if you will remember, the Act of 1917 applied to enemies “other than citizens of the United States.” So in 1917 the war powers did not extend to citizens of the United States, and the government did not have authority over us and the Constitution was still valid and upheld. But Roosevelt made an amendment to the 1917 Act, in 1933. In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933 it states:

    “Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended as follows;
    During time of war or during any other time of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and export, hording, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

    By simply including in this amendment “any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, citizens of the United States were now included in the definition of ‘enemies of the United States’! As far as any commercial, monetary or business transactions were concerned, United States citizens were no longer any different from any other enemy of the United States.

    To summarize:

    In 1917, due to World War I, Congress passed the Trading With the Enemy Act, and defined the enemy as “other than citizens of the United States”. This Act allowed the government to take control of any and all commercial, monetary or business transactions conducted by enemies within our continental borders. Section 5(b) of this Act gave the President unlimited powers to control the commercial transactions of the defined enemies.

    During the Korean War, there was much publicity over the fact that Congress never declared war and charges were flung back and forth that the war was illegal. The same thing took place in the Viet Nam war and elsewhere. Today the President is still engaging our forces in foreign countries without the consent of Congress. These acts of the President are 100% legal, because as Commander-in-Chief he still has his emergency powers and he does not need the approval of Congress to engage in war. Congress only makes ‘public policy’ as trustees of the bankruptcy.

    In the amendment in 1933, the Act was expanded to include “any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Remember a “person” is a corporation! The people of the United States then became subject to the powers of the Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917. Note that the war power acts were also expanded to include ‘national emergencies’, as defined by the President. And didn’t Roosevelt just proclaim a national banking emergency? Where does that place us? Since this Act is still on the books today, then it is still binding until the national emergency is resolved.

    What was the national emergency in 1933? It was a banking crisis. The stock market had crashed in 1929 and a depression was in full swing. All the banks were closed for a ‘bank holiday’.

    The REAL crisis was that until this Act was passed in 1933, your bank deposits were backed by gold in the vaults. The problem was that the gold was no longer there, and people were lining up at the banks and demanding to cash in their gold certificates for the gold they supposedly had on deposit.

    The banks didn’t have the gold to return. A real crisis.

    What did they do with the gold? Gold was legally limited to $35 an ounce in the United States. But in Europe the value of gold floated and was worth $60 an ounce. The banks sold their gold to the European bankers and made a tidy profit at their customer’s expense.

    President Roosevelt took office on March 4, 1933. During his term of office he implemented 100’s of new national programs under the guise of a national emergency. Most of those programs are still on the books today, because we still have an emergency in those areas. The areas include, agriculture, banking, welfare, farming, etc. These emergency powers have been extended every year by the President, for some reason or other, and are still in full force today.

    But you ask, “Are we STILL under a national emergency, and under martial law?” Yes, and have been since 1863, which was greatly expanded in 1933. In fact a special committee was formed to study the termination of the national emergency.

    This was done with Senate Report 93-549, July 24, 1973, which said:

    “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.” “These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers exercised by Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers taken together, confer enough authority to rule this country without reference to normal constitutional process.”

    This report WAS acted upon and the 94th Congress passed:

    Public Law 94-112 – September 14, 1976 “To terminate certain authorities with respect to national emergencies still in effect, and to provide for orderly implementation and termination of future national emergencies.”

    There was one exception to this act though, in Section 502(a): “The provisions of this Act shall not apply to the following provisions of law, the powers and authorities conferred thereby, and actions taken thereunder: (1) Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. 95a; 50 U.S.C. App. 5(b);”

    So, what really happened? Did the national emergency of 1917, amended in 1933, come to an end? NO! We are still governed by 12 U.S.C. 95a & 95b, which originated with the Act of March 9, 1933. We are still living under emergency rule and martial law!

    Can the state of emergency and martial law powers be terminated? Yes they can, but there is a problem. The Commander-in-Chief can terminate the martial powers at any time, BUT it would not make any difference, because what lawful government would take over? First a lawfully constituted authority would have to be put into power to replace the military power we are under now. So even if the martial rule was terminated we would still be exactly where we are now. Nothing would be accomplished. We would have to go back to the limitations of the Constitution, and the present government would never go along with that!



This wicked façade and fraud that has been perpetrated upon the American people now for over 139 years has become so entrenched and has lasted so long that most of our citizens are none the wiser, and they don’t have a clue as to what is truly going on behind the scenes that is undermining our U.S. Constitution and is virtually guarantying, unless We the People take back our government, that these International Bankers will get their way and will ultimately establish a totalitarian dictatorship, operating under what they term a “New World Order.”

Folks, unless we tear this existing façade down, which is the UNITED STATES CORPORATION, which is both unconstitutional and therefore is illegal; and rebuild our government, as was originally intended by our founding fathers, upon a solid foundation as a Constitutional Republic, then anything less than that is nothing but meaningless window dressing.

You CANNOT build anything on a corrupt foundation and expect that it will last!

The ONLY thing that will prevent this “New World Order” from happening here in our country is if “We the People” take back our government and reinhabit our Constitutional Republic!

Join with us won’t you and sign up today… see link below!


Skip Barland

IT’S OFFICIAL… Barack Hussein Obama was NEVER vetted for office!!!

Barack Hussein Obama

is an

Well it is official, as you can see in the above video and read below as per this WND report, that according to a recently released Congressional report, Congress now admits that Barack Hussein Obama was NEVER vetted for office; and neither was there any statutory requirement that he be vetted, which ignores our U.S. Constitution requirments.

Neither were there ever any collaborating documents that were ever requested by any governmental agency in order to prove either Obama’s citizenship or his place of birth.

Folks, what further evidence do you need that this façade called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, which is totally unconstitutional and was formed by the forty-first Congress in 1871 without Constitutional authority to do so (when the District of Columbia was formed), is totally illegal; and our country and all fifty states of the union, who once were formed as Republics, have all since been changed over to CORPORATE entities, that no longer view We the People as the sovereigns of our country, as per our U.S. Constitution and our Declaration of Independence; but as is the case with any corporation, it is the corporation that reins as sovereign, and the people are required to conform to its demands.

The truth is ever since the Act of 1871 was passed our nation’s leaders have cast our “organic” U.S. Constitution to the sidelines, and have not been abiding by it for the last 139 years.

Here is the history:

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the “Acts of the Forty-First Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.”

This is also known as the “Act of 1871.”

What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let’s look at the circumstances of those days.

The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated “front” for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers.

If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position.

This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important.

This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner.

With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

“The Constitution for the united states of America”.

The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn’t. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

Anything we do now as a nation that fails to remove this corrupt leaven from our government, starting with this foreign owned and operated central bank, called the FEDERAL RESERVE; or that fails to hold accountable those elected officials (Democrats and Republicans) who have knowingly sold our country out and have violated their oath of office to preserve, defend, and to protect our U.S. Constitution, and have done so for personal greed and their lust for power; and any effort to rebuild our nation that fails to address our core foundational issues that most threatened our survival as nation, is nothing but window dressing.

The ONLY answer for what ails our nation is for We the People to take back our nation and to reinhabit our Constitutional Republic, as was originally intended by our forefathers; which by the way has already happened, and all that is required now is for the American People to join in and support it.


Skip Barland


Tuesday, November 09, 2010

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Congress report concedes
Obama eligibility unvetted

‘There is no specific federal agency’
to review candidates for federal office

Posted: November 08, 2010
8:38 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi


A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.

It’s because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a “natural born Citizen” under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.

The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. It explains no one was required to do so.

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama’s presidency

Technically, the CRS is a public policy research arm of the United States Congress that is organized as a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress; the CRS works exclusively for members of Congress, congressional committees and congressional staff in an advisory capacity, answering questions.

The CRS memorandum, published and distributed to congressional offices April 3, 2009, was written to explain to senators and members of the House how they could answer constituents who were demanding to see Obama’s birth certificate.

It first appeared on a blog posted by Mario Apuzzo, who has pending before the U.S. Supreme Court a request to hear a case claiming Congress and others failed to abide by the Constitution when they refused to investigate Obama’s eligibility.

He explains the document, which has been posted online, was obtained through the “diligent and persistent efforts of a patriot going by the pen name of ‘Tom Deacon,’ who obtained it from a senator’s office.”

Authored by Jack Maskell, the legislative attorney in the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service, the document was a memorandum written for the subject “Qualifications for the Office of President of the United States and Legal Challenges to the Eligibility of a Candidate”

Maskell confirmed to WND that the document is authentic.

He explained he wrote it only for distribution to congressional offices, not for public distribution, and it was not posted on any of the CRS report sites where the public might have been able to find it.

He suggested one of the congressional offices that got the report facilitated its release, and it ended up posted on the Internet.

Maskell told WND he wrote it because so many members of Congress were getting questions from constituents about the issue, and they wanted to know how to respond. It would explain why so many mailed and e-mailed responses to constituents on the issue of eligibility sound just alike.

The CRS begins the memo by stating the problem:

“Many of the inquiries have questioned why then-Senator, and now President, Obama has not had to produce an original, so-called ‘long’ version of a ‘birth certificate’ from the State of Hawaii, how federal candidates are ‘vetted’ for qualifications generally, and have asked for an assessment of the various allegations and claims of non-eligibility status.”

In other words, senators and members of the House could not explain why nobody ever saw Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, and they needed a ready answer to give angry constituents who were writing, faxing and telephoning their offices for an answer.

The second full paragraph of the CRS memo must be read in its entirety to understand fully the circumstance that allowed a candidate for whom documentation was concealed from the public to be elected and sworn in as president.

It states:

“Concerning the production or release of an original birth certificate, it should be noted that there is no federal law, regulation, rule, guideline, or requirement that a candidate for federal office produce his or her original birth certificate, or a certified copy of the record of live birth, to any official of the United States government; nor is there a requirement for federal candidates to publicly release such personal record or documentation. Furthermore, there is no specific federal agency or office that ‘vets’ candidates for federal office as to qualifications or eligibility prior to return.”

What the CRS admits is that Obama got a pass from Congress and the federal government as a whole on his birth qualifications under Article 2, Section 1. Nobody in Congress or the federal government sought to look for Obama’s certified long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, because no law or regulation required them to look.

After the document was written, nobody in Congress could claim that Congress or anyone else in the federal government had reviewed Obama’s birth certificate or determined Obama was eligible to be president. It simply did not happen.

A screen capture of the document’s first page, including the key second paragraph, confirms the conclusion:

The CRS memo also admits that federal elections are administered under state law, a circumstance apparent to lawyers but sometimes complicated for others.

The relevant paragraph:

“The mechanics of elections of federal officials within the several states are administered under state law. The quadrennial presidential election, although required since 1845 to be held on the same day in each state is, in an administrative and operational sense, fifty-one separate elections in the states and the District of Columbia for presidential electors. States generally control, within the applicable constitutional parameters, the administrative issues, questions, and mechanisms of ballot placement and ballot access.”

The next key point is that like federal law, neither do state laws require anyone to examine the birth qualifications of presidential candidates.

The states may have discretionary authority to question a candidate’s eligibility to run for federal office, but there is no requirement in state law to do so, not when it comes to looking at birth records.

Once more, the memo makes this plain:

“In Keyes v. Bowen, the California Supreme Court discussed a suit against the secretary of state that challenged President Obama’s eligibility and the California electoral votes for [the] finding that: ‘Petitioners have not identified any authority requiring the secretary of state to make an inquiry into or demand detailed proof of citizenship from presidential candidates,’ and thus mandamus (a writ of mandate) was not granted. However, although no ‘ministerial duty’ or mandatory requirement exists to support a mandamus action, there may still exist discretionary authority in such elections official.”

A writ of mandamus in this case brought by Ambassador Alan Keyes would have involved a court order being issued by the secretary of state in California demanding Obama produce his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to get his name on California’s presidential ballot in 2008.

What the CRS is saying is that since there was no state law demanding Obama show his birth certificate, the court could not demand he do so. It was entirely up to the California secretary of state who had discretion to ask for the document or not ask for the document, depending upon what the California secretary of state, a Democrat for othis election cycle, wanted to do.

The CRS’s conclusion is that Obama could refuse to show his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate because no state or federal law required him reveal it.

The report said, therefore, Obama could release exactly what information he chose.

“Despite the absence of any formal administrative or legal requirement or oversight at the federal level, or specific state requirement to produce a birth certificate for ballot placement, it may be noted here briefly that the only ‘official’ documentation or record that has been presented in the matter of President Obama’s eligibility has been an official, certified copy of the record of live birth released by the Obama campaign in June of 2008, as an apparent effort by then-candidate Obama to address rumors and innuendos concerning the place of his birth.”

The result is that Obama could choose exactly what information – and in what format – he wanted released. He chose the computer-generated Certification of Live Birth, a form from the state of Hawaii that officials there have provided to those not born in the state, to document his eligibility.

The CRS also makes it clear that if the birth requirements of the Constitution are to be taken seriously, new laws at the state and federal levels will be needed to institutionalize government procedures requiring president candidates to come forward with their eligibility documentation.

A video based on WND’s report on the CRS has now been posted online and is embedded here:

WND has reported on a multitude of legal and other challenges to Obama’s eligibility that arose even before his election.

The claims are that Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.” The lawsuits have asserted he either was not born in Hawaii as he claims or was a dual citizen because of his father’s British citizenship at the time of his birth.

The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama’s birth could be obtained.

Besides Obama’s actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Several states already have begun working on various requirements for candidates to document their eligibility, and one proposal remains pending at the federal level.




Yeshua Ha’Mashiach

His name in English is: Jesus, the Christ—Anointed One (Messiah)…

and He watches over His sheep!!!

Are you facing struggles in your life?

Read on…

Concentrate on this sentence:

“To get something you never had, you have to do something you never did”

When God takes something from your grasp, He’s not punishing you, but merely opening your hands to receive something better.

Concentrate on this sentence:

“The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you.” Something good will happen to you today, something that you have been waiting for.

Say this prayer:

God our Father, walk through my house and take away all my worries and illnesses and please watch over and heal my family – in Jesus name, Amen.


If you have yet to make that decision for Christ watch this video:

For those who have yet to accept Yeshua as Messiah, Lord, and Savior, and are looking for evidence that demands a verdict as to who he is, read on:

Fulfilled Prophecy as Evidence for the Bible’s Divine Origin

  • 2,000 prophecies including some 300 prophecies and implications about the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
  • There are no prophetic failures.
  • While there are both obvious and subtle prophecies, most are very detailed and specific.
  • No other religion has specific, repeated, and unfailing fulfillment of predictions many years in advance of contingent events over which the predictor had no control.
  • Studies of psychics show only around 8% of their predictions come true and virtually all of these can be attributed to chance and a general knowledge of circumstances.
  • Mathematicians have calculated the odds of Jesus fulfilling only 8 of the Messianic prophecies as 1 out of 1017 (a 1 followed by 17 zeros). This is equivalent to covering the entire state of Texas with silver dollars 2 feet deep, marking one of them, mixing them all up and having a blind-folded person select the marked one at random the first time. For more on this, see What Are The Odds?
  • Fulfilled prophecy is powerful evidence that the Bible is divine rather than human in origin.
  • Objection: Jesus manipulated events to fulfill prophecy. Answer: (a) Many prophecies were out of his control (ancestry, place of birth, time of death). (b) His miracles confirmed Jesus to be the Messiah. (c) There is no evidence that Jesus was a deceiver. (d) In order to manipulate all the people (including his enemies) and even his disciples to make it appear that he was the Messiah, Jesus would have needed supernatural powers. If he had such powers, he must have been the Messiah he claimed to be.

Examples of Messianic Prophecies


Old Testament

New Testament

Messiah to be the seed of the Woman Genesis 3:15 Luke 2:5-7
Galatians 4:4
Messiah to be the seed of Abraham Genesis 12:2-3, 18:18 Matthew 1:1-2
Luke 3:34
Acts 3:25
Galatians 3:16
Messiah to be of the tribe of Judah Genesis 49:10 Matthew 1:1-2
Messiah to be of the seed of David 2 Samuel 7:16
Psalm 132:11
Jeremiah 23:5, 33:15
Matthew 1:6, 22:42-45
Luke 1:31-33
Acts 2:29-30
Romans 1:3
Messiah to be born of a virgin Isaiah 7:14 Matthew 1:18-25
Luke 1:26-38
Messiah to be born in Bethlehem Micah 5:2 Matthew 2:1-6
Luke 2:4-6
Tribute paid to Messiah by great kings Psalm 72:10-11 Matthew 2:1-11
Messiah to be heralded by a messenger Isaiah 40:3
Malachi 3:1
Matthew 3:1-3
Messiah to be the Son of God Psalm 2:2,7 Matthew 3:17
Luke 1:32-33
Messiah to be anointed by the Holy Spirit Isaiah 11:2 Matthew 3:16-17
Galilee to be the first area of Messiah’s ministry Isaiah 9:1-7 Matthew 4:12-16
Messiah to be meek and mild Isaiah 40:11, 42:2-3, 53:7 Matthew 12:18-20, 26:62-68
Messiah to minister to the Gentiles Isaiah 42:1, 49:6-8 Matthew 12:21
Luke 2:28-32
Messiah will perform miracles Isaiah 35:5-6 Matthew 9:35, 11:3-6
John 9:6-7
Messiah to be a prophet like Moses Deuteronomy 18:15-19 Matthew 21:11, 24:1-35
John 1:45, 6:14
Acts 3:20-23
Messiah to enter the temple with authority Malachi 3:1-2 Matthew 21:12
Messiah will enter Jerusalem on a donkey Zechariah 9:9-10 Matthew 21:1-11
Messiah to be betrayed by a friend Psalm 41:9 John 13:18-21
Messiah to be forsaken by his disciples Zechariah 13:7 Matthew 26:31, 56
Messiah will be smitten Isaiah 50:6 Matthew 26:67, 27:26,30
Messiah to experience crucifixion (long before crucifixion was invented) Psalm 22:15-17 Matthew 27:34-50
John 19:28-30
Messiah will be pierced Zechariah 12:10 John 19:34-37
Details of Messiah’s suffering and death and resulting salvation (hundreds of years before Christ!) Psalm 69:21
Isaiah 53:2-12,
Matthew 26-27
Mark 15-16
Luke 22-23
John 18-19
Messiah to die in 33 AD Daniel 9:24-26 33 AD is the widely accepted historical date of the crucifixion
Casting of lots for His garments Psalm 22:18 John 19:23-24
Messiah to be raised from the dead Psalm 16:10 Acts 2:25-31, 13:32-37, 17:2-3
Messiah’s resurrection Job 19:25
Psalm 16:10
Acts 2:30-31, 13:32-35, 17:2-3
1 Corinthians 15:20-22
Messiah to ascend to heaven Psalm 68:18 Luke 24:51
Acts 1:9
Ephesians 4:8-13
Messiah to be at the right hand of God Psalm 110:1 Matthew 26:64
Mark 14:62
Romans 8:34
Hebrews 1:3
Messiah, the stone which the builders rejected, to become the head cornerstone Psalm 118:22-23
Isaiah 8:14-15, 28:16
Matthew 21:42-43
Acts 4:11
Romans 9:32-33
Ephesians 2:20
1 Peter 2:6-8

Posted Marathon Conference Call for the RESTORED Republic of USA – Recorded 10/30/10

Your reinhabited Constitutional Republic has been formed…


The GOOD NEWS is that the restored Republic of the united states of America is growing and moving forward; but there are still things that need to happen and be expedited at the State and local levels, which are discussed in this conference call!

On the other side the news is not so good for U.S. CORP; and the silence in the U.S. News media so far on this subject is deafening, as the UNITED STATES CORPORATION, according to investment people across the world, including bankers, and people inside the international intelligence community, are all saying the same thing, as even the Congressional Budget Office has recently reported, and that is this house of cards, called our American economy is about to collapse.

This collapse is owed to the fact that U.S. CORP is both bankrupt and insolvent; it has no capitol, no cash, no collateral, and no longer does it have the credibility and confidence of the international community.

So consequently U.S. CORP is about to collapse under the weight of its now over 13.7 Trillion Dollar debt, as the U.S. CORPORATION continues its deficit spending now at the rate of over 4.16 Billion Dollars of additional debt which is being added to this negative ledger every single day!

What will follow if we are not able to show that we have a structured government in place when U.S. CORP defaults, the United Nations, which is nothing but another arm of the Globalist Intentional Bankers, will come in and take over by military force and martial law will be declared in our country!

So either we get the pillow of our already restored Constitutional Republic, or we get the boot and bayonet of martial law and the “New World Order!”

Now I ask you, which do you want for your children?

What follows is a 5 ½ hour marathon conference call where interim President of the restored Republic of the united states of America, Timothy Turner, answers a lot of questions and explains where we are and the whats and whys of why the individual states of the union now need to expedite the completion of their State Republic System, in time to be ready to take over, and return our government to our original de jure Constitutional Republic, when the present corporate system collapses.

(Click on above link to hear conference call)

The call is long, but contains relevant and important information.

Also, please note that it will automatically advance consecutively through each segment to the next; or you can manually advance forward, which ever you prefer.

For more information on how you can help, please follow the following link: